Archive for the ‘cross-package documentation’ Category

more cross-package docs details

July 20, 2009

I cleaned up most of the loose edges.  I still need to design and implement the GADT records syntax (should be easy) ; I was thinking:

Here is an example of haddock’s record-display:

http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/1.1.0.2/doc/html/Control-Monad-Cont.html#v%3ACont

and here’s for an ordinary data type:

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Data-Maybe.html#t%3AMaybe

Notice that records can have documentation per-constructor-argument.

So we need to decide what syntax we want, since there’s a tension between displaying the type of the constructor itself (including any class contexts, as GHC just implemented syntax for!), and having a separate line on which to document each field.

I’m inclined to copy type information a bit and have it look like, for
data Foo a where
Bar :: Ord a => { f1 :: [a]  — ^ Some values.
} -> Foo a
,
Bar :: Ord a => [a] -> Foo a
f1 :: [a]     Some values.

Or maybe explicit forall “Bar :: forall a. Ord a => [a] -> Foo a” since it obviously needs to (conceptually) scope over the following fields.

-Isaac

Cross-package documentation going well!

July 9, 2009
A good deal of success!  Here is the current status of my loose edges… Plus I’m sure there are some inevitable syntax niceties (choosing when to display in GADT syntax for example), but using this approach, they can’t be perfect, only pretty-good.  (The approach is similar to going through Template Haskell except we found out that TH/Convert had some problems, such as producing RdrNames rather than Names, so I wrote the equivalent function to go directly from TyThing to HsDecl Name).  So:(tyThingToHsSyn :: TyThing -> LHsDecl Name) is done (except probably for a few corner cases) — it compiles and works! (under 6.11.something and 6.10.3; I just failed to install ghc-paths for 6.8.2[*]) Paste of my working module here:
http://hpaste.org/6717

[*]cabal install –with-compiler=ghc-6.8.2 ghc-paths
/tmp/ghc-paths-0.1.0.522545/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/Setup.hs:7:7:
Could not find module `Distribution.Simple.PackageIndex’:

Important remaining corner cases include:
- It seems that TyCon needs to export a new function (tyConParent :: TyCon -> TyConParent), because there’s no way to get that info presently!
- (isFunTyCon tc || isPrimTyCon tc) : how the heck am I supposed to represent these in a TyClDecl? :-)
- When the HsDecls tree contains something of type HsDoc, do I just leave it empty? Will Haddock-code need to / already does fill that in? I guess I’ll find that out once I test my code on more things…? or what?
- it looks like I neglected to implement class ATs yet.

Also, (parseName “Prelude.->”) crashed GHC with “isDataOcc: check me ->”, so I wasn’t able to test it yet :-) … or is it one of those syntaxes that’s so fixed that you’re not even allowed to export or import it, perhaps?

***

Also I succeeded at integrating it into Haddock.  Well, almost.  For module List, I have the English documentation being displayed where it should be, and I have the signature displayed: all the signatures are “() -> ()”, :-P .  I still need to finish threading the Ghc monad through Haddock.Interface.Create so that I can call lookupName at the right times.
- foible: I needed to convert InstalledInterface’s (HsDoc DocName) to ExportDecl’s (HsDoc Name), so I had to essentially write fmap for HsDoc, because it’s lamely not an instance of class Functor.  Where should that fmap-code be put? (can it be derived yet?)
- In Haddock.Interface.Create:
-* Under what circumstances is (Map.lookup (nameModule t) instIfaceMap) == Nothing?  Is it if we haddock a package for which its dependencies are compiled, but not, themselves, haddocked?
-* I didn’t figure out where to get ExportDecl’s expItemInstances from (but I didn’t really look around for it yet)

okay that’s enough for the day! I need some sleep! And some feedback would be good.  Besides that, I do have a plan: Integrate the two pieces I just did; Test on lots more examples than just haskell98-List; fix the things that I obviously neglected; Make the code a bit more presentable.  Any big pieces I’m leaving out that we have to do before starting to integrate my code?  (well, hoping that there aren’t any more big unexpected things that break along the way, anyway)

-Isaac

cross-package, Plan A

June 25, 2009

I think my next step should be the simpler bit: extend .haddock files to contain their docs. (After doing that, I might have a better guess where best to thread in the type-signatures.)

Which means,

#1. That we need to write the info to .haddock files
#2. that we can parse it.
#3. that InstalledInterface can hold it
#4. find out if there’s anything we need to do to make use of the new info in InstalledInterface… well obviously there is :-)

A test case would be a package, that imports and re-exports anything that has a doc-string.  I could probably download haskell98 from hackage and use it as a test case.

This is out of order I’m sure: at least writing the info probably means we have to change InstalledInterface first, for example.  That’s what plans are for: trying them and refactoring them when they fail!

P.S. I’m doing an awful job at synchronizing my sleep cycle with SimonMar’s… it’s 2 a.m. U.S. East Coast time here, time for me to go to bed (or past time rather :-)

Cross-package documentation, part 1

June 24, 2009

It would appear to the casual observer that Haddock works fairly excellently cross-packages.  For example, I haddocked the Haddock code, and all the links to the types from the GHC API point to the haddock-docs in my GHC 6.10.3 installation.  (Yes, you need the versions of the dependent packages chosen, installed and haddocked, and this doesn’t always work out optimally online. But that’s not the problem that I’m confronting.)

Yes, links work.  But that’s about it, right now.  Compare (broken)  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/docs/libraries/haskell98/List.html to (good) http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/docs/libraries/base/Data-List.html .  The broken one’s source (haskell98:List) imports the good one (base:Data.List).  haskell98:List’s documentation luckily lists the *names* of the exported things, because they’re listed in that file’s export list.  But not their types or their docs.  Not the module doc header (though that shouldn’t be copied anyway), and there’s no link to base:Data.List (which is acceptable. Although maybe someone should write a haddock-header to haskell98:List that says it’s the Haskell 98 version (specified at http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/list.html ) of the slightly expanded base-package Data.List[link].

Anyway, the way we get any links to modules in other packages is because we read their generated .haddock files.  They’re binary and haddock doesn’t have any obvious way to make them human-readable, but they correspond to Haddock.InterfaceFile.InterfaceFile.  Which is, roughly, a list of Haddock.Types.InstalledInterface, which seems to be the interesting bit.

data InstalledInterface = InstalledInterface {
instMod            :: Module,
instInfo           :: HaddockModInfo Name,
instDocMap         :: Map Name (HsDoc DocName),
instExports        :: [Name],
instVisibleExports :: [Name],
instOptions        :: [DocOption],
instSubMap         :: Map Name [Name]
}

A Module (not to be confused with GhcModule, which is defined by Haddock) is a low-information type defined in GHC that contains the package name and version and the module name.

HaddockModInfo is just the module’s header description, plus the portability:, stability:, maintainer: fields (HaddockModInfo is defined in GHC, oddly enough: must be parse result. defined in ghc:HsSyn to be precise.)

DocOptions are hide, prune, ignore-exports, not-home. (defined in haddock code.)

The rest contain a lot of “Name”s, which is a GHC thing that refers unambiguously to the place an identifier originates.  Sufficient for making a link, but not sufficient by itself for copying the named identifier’s docs or type.  So passing over them for now… there is one interesting thing left.

A DocName contains a Name and also (if any) the module we’d like to link to in which that name is documented.  instDocMap :: Map Name (HsDoc DocName).  This gives more info on any number of Name identifiers.  (HsDoc provides formatting, DocName provides its references .)  There is no type information here at all, as far as I can tell, which will clearly need to be remedied somehow (in Interface, roughly a superset of InstalledInterface, types appears in ifaceDeclMap, though I’m not sure if that’s where they’re retrieved from for HTML-doc-printing).  But there’s another big question I need to find out: *which* names are documented in any given module’s instDocMap?  The type provides no clue, nor does its current (lack of a) doc string, nor ifaceRnDocMap.  I could look everywhere in the code that it’s generated, or I could ask David Waern… who will need to tell me if I said anything confused here anyway :-)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.